Monday, August 29, 2016

WOLF'S CRAG BUILT BY NIMROD FARROW IN 1820
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/121610173

FIND-A-GRAVE FOR NIMROD FARROW  http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=83699549 

NIMROD FARROW WORLD CAT http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n2011026860/

Monday, August 22, 2016

 "Mr. Israel Ketchum has this day presented the within account, and can produce vouchers for the same, if it should be required. I do hereby promise to Mr. Israel Ketchum, in the event of the government allowing the claim of Messrs. Farrow and Harris, contractors for the erection of fortifications on Dauphin island, his claim, so far as it is right and just, and I do not know, at the present moment, anything to the contrary ; but his claim is justly due to him, which shall be paid to him, or his representatives, in the event of the government leaving it in the power of me to do so. "Given under my hand, this 10th day of March, 1824. »N. FARROW.

 In addition to the testimony heretofore submitted the petitioner pre sents the affidavit of Gilbert C. Russell, who deposes that he signed the bond required by the act of 1825 on condition that he "was to receive the property or money in lieu thereof, and pay the debts, which amounted to $112,000." He says: "The Secretary of War, in accordance with the requirements of the act, dismissed a suit then pending against Harris & Farrow and paid the $73,000, but absolutely refused to give an order for the return of the property out of the proceeds of which their debts were to be paid. I was sued by Roland Clapp, who claimed $6,000, and was held to bail. From the order to hold me to bail I was discharged, upon the ground that the Secretary of War had failed to execute the provision of the act ; whereupon Clapp dismissed his suit." The deponent adds : " Had the secretary complied with this, the most important provision of the act, the just debts of Harris & Farrow would have been paid ; but the Secretary of War positively refused to execute this part of the law, and the debts due for work done and materials delivered were not paid."


Monday, December 15, 1828  Mr. Cambreleng presented a petition of Israel Ketchum, of the city of New York, a sub-contractor under Farrow and Harris, in the erection of fortifications on Dauphin Island, at the entrance of Mobile bay, praying that provision may be made for the payment of the claims of all the sub-contractors under said Farrow and Harris.




ISRAEL KETCHUM  https://books.google.com/books?id=YWtHAQAAIAAJ&pg=PR148&lpg=PR148&dq=%22Israel+Ketchum%22+%22FARROW+AND+HARRIS%22&source=bl&ots=BWRakWk6Lt&sig=lA568NEGIzOBQdqw_YtUt6je8Ok&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiint36vdXOAhVM1R4KHVfoC9YQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Israel%20Ketchum%22%20%22FARROW%20AND%20HARRIS%22&f=false

ROLAND CLAPP LAWSUIT AGAINST GILBERT RUSSELL https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/hein/0002.f.cas/0002.f.cas.0770.1.raw.pdf

 PARMENIO ADAMS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parmenio_Adams

 JAMES BARBOUR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Barbour

ISRAEL KETCHUM https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=YWtHAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PR147

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Friday, August 19, 2016

Few of you are familiar with Isaac McKeever (1791-1858) but as a U.S. Navy officer of Commodore Patterson's anti-piracy squadron in the Gulf, McKeever made his mark in the shallow water of the Mississippi Sound and the mouth of Mobile Bay from 1814 to 1818, Dauphin Island's first formative years of being an American port. McKeever is the subject of this week's DAUPHIN ISLAND HISTORY post. Please check out his story. http://dauphinislandhistory.blogspot.com

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

The capture of the three slave ships occurred one year before the passage of the Act of 1819 which equated the slave trader with a pirate and made the penalty for participating in the African slave trade the same as piracy, punishable by death. ( In 1862, the last man hanged in the U.S. for piracy in New York City. He was a slave trader. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_to_Protect_the_Commerce_of_the_United_States_and_Punish_the_Crime_of_Piracy

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

 INWARD SLAVE MANIFESTS http://www.afrigeneas.com/slavedata/Roll.1.1818-1820.html


THOMAS SHIELDS used to transport slaves in 1819 
ENTRY #2

Port: New Orleans to Bay of St   Ù. Louis    

Schooner:

Thomas Shields

Owner: J. H. Hawkins, New Orleans

Date: June 1819

Slaves:

Simon         m    26   5-11   All Black

Grace?        f    34   5-8       

Hannah        f    28   5-9       

Oliver        m    14   5-0       

Nancy         f    13   5-0

Lucy          f     4  
W.E.B. DuBois SUPPRESSION OF THE AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE
At this date (January 7, 1819), however, certain cases were stated to be pending, a history of which will fitly conclude this discussion. In 1818 three American schooners sailed from the United States to Havana; on June 2 they started back with cargoes aggregating one hundred and seven slaves. The schooner "Constitution" was captured by one of Andrew Jackson's officers under the guns of Fort Barancas. The "Louisa" and "Marino" were captured by Lieutenant McKeever of the United States Navy. The three vessels were duly proceeded against at Mobile, and the case began slowly to drag along. The slaves, instead of being put under the care of the zealous marshal of the district, were placed in the hands of three bondsmen, friends of the judge. The marshal notified the government of this irregularity, but apparently received no answer. In 1822 the three vessels were condemned as forfeited, but the court "reserved" for future order the distribution of the slaves. Nothing whatever either then or later was done to the slave-traders themselves. The owners of the ships promptly appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, and that tribunal, in 1824, condemned the three vessels and the slaves on two of them.104 These slaves, considerably reduced in number "from various causes," were sold at auction for the benefit of the State, in spite of the Act of 1819. Meantime, before the decision of the Supreme Court, the judge of the Supreme Court of West Florida had awarded to certain alleged Spanish claimants of the slaves indemnity for nearly the whole number seized, at the price of $650 per head, and the Secretary of the Treasury had actually paid the claim.105 In 1826 Lieutenant McKeever urgently petitions Congress for his prize-money of $4,415.15, which he has not yet121 received.106 The "Constitution" was for some inexplicable reason released from bond, and the whole case fades in a very thick cloud of official mist. In 1831 Congress sought to inquire into the final disposition of the slaves. The information given was never printed; but as late as 1836 a certain Calvin Mickle petitions Congress for reimbursement for the slaves sold, for their hire, for their natural increase, for expenses incurred, and for damages.

Thursday, August 11, 2016

 Scribner's
https://books.google.com/books?id=t0V7cCVQbhQC&pg=PA460&lpg=PA460&dq=louisa+merino+slaves&source=bl&ots=TgKzHtdaWV&sig=a-bZ0IePHox5KMNUJRLm164DUmQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiY-7jCmcbOAhUB7SYKHZgoAx4Q6AEIQTAI#v=onepage&q=louisa%20merino%20slaves&f=false



WILKINSON D.I. https://books.google.com/books?id=bgYYCgAAQBAJ&pg=PR12&lpg=PR12&dq=%22DAUPHIN+ISLAND%22+FILIBUSTER&source=bl&ots=oKxFHc68-j&sig=rHXg2p608kTEwRSu568e1vSwbnQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjQvK6BncbOAhWENSYKHQJeC2kQ6AEIQDAG#v=onepage&q=%22DAUPHIN%20ISLAND%22%20FILIBUSTER&f=false

 PRECURSOR http://rrcaolt.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/7/0/8470429/olt_paper_sample.pdf


Supreme Court Record on the slave smuggling case https://books.google.com/books?id=NAIM6OZNywAC&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq=louisa+merino+slaves&source=bl&ots=Y33KgRdo_K&sig=WJoevF1mtpRBW-USETv9v8fmky8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiY-7jCmcbOAhUB7SYKHZgoAx4Q6AEILzAD#v=onepage&q=louisa%20merino%20slaves&f=false

Fourth Annual Message (November 14, 1820)

James Monroe


  "Considerable progress has been made during the present season in examining the coast and its various bays and other inlets, in the collection of materials, and in the construction of fortifications for the defense of the Union at several of the positions at which it has been decided to erect such works. At Mobile Point and Dauphin Island, and at the Rigolets, leading to Lake Pontchartrain, materials to a considerable amount have been collected, and all the necessary preparations made for the commencement of the works."


Quates paper / Fort Crawford https://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd%3A1218/datastream/OBJ/view



ACTS OF THE 1824 ALABAMA LEGISLATURE                                                        To establish certain election precincts therein named.
Section 1.  Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the state of Alabama in General Assembly convened,  That the election precinct heretofore established at the house of Robert Lewis in the county of mobile, be, and the same is hereby discontinued; and that the following election precincts, be, and the same are hereby established in said county, to wit: one at the house of James Johnston, in he northern district; one at the house of Barthelami Grelot, in the southern district; and one at the house of John Baptiste Lamy on Dauphin Island; and also one at Spring Hill.


La Harpe ~ Texas pioneer  https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/fla01



 https://books.google.com/books?id=v2kAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA371&lpg=PA371&dq=adjudication+%22dauphin+island%22&source=bl&ots=QV6VktPjuj&sig=s1_Nba4DEye9fK4qb4hFbQpsmtY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjc7YuRpMHOAhWC5CYKHedQAgI4ChDoAQguMAM#v=onepage&q=adjudication%20%22dauphin%20island%22&f=false
Feb. 9. The senate met pursuant to adjournment. The president communicated a report from the se cretary of war, detailing the manner in which the act of the 3d of March, 1823, has been executed, authoriz ing him to appoint a suitable persen "to ascertain whether there has been any failure on the part of tho U. States, in the fulfilment of contracts for erecting fortifications on Dauphin island; and if so, to ascertain the amount of damages thus sustained by Richard Harris and Nimrod Farrow, the contractors, by such failure; and also, to ascertain whether the said con tractors themselves have failed in fulfilling the con tract on their part, and tho cause of such faijure;" which was read, and ordered to be printed.



Grant Pass. To amend act to authorize construction and maintenance of bridge between mainland and Dauphin Island, Mobile County, Ala., etc., report to accompany S. 4476 [to amend act to authorize Dauphin Island Railway and Harbor Company to construct bridge or bridges, or viaducts, across Grant Pass between mainland at or near Cedar Point and Dauphin Island, both Little and Big, also to dredge channel from Mobile Bay into Dauphin Bay, also to construct docks and wharves along both Little and Big Dauphin islands, as amended, so as to extend time] ; submitted by Mr. Sheppard. Mar. 28, 1916. 2 p. (S. rp. 313.)



https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=0YcbAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA341

 [2d Session. INDEMNITY FOR SLAVES CARRIED AWAY BY GREAT BRITAIN IN 1815. COMMUNICATED TO THE SENATE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION DECEMBER 20, 1826. Extract of Instructions from H. Clay to R. King, May 10, 1825.                                                          "3. In the case of Jumonville de Villiers, a citizen of Louisiana, the claim of indemnity for twenty slaves, carried away from Dauphin island, in trm Bay of Mobile, does not appear to have been questioned by Mr. Jackson, upon the ground either of the sufficiency of the proof by which it was established, or the time of the transportation of the slaves; but to the allowance of the claim he objected, upon the pretence that Dauphin island was no part of the territory of the United States, but belonged to West Florida. Mr. Cheves, declining to discuss our incontestable right to that island, derived from the cession of Louisiana, of which it constituted a part, offered to refer the- difference between him and his associate, agreeably to the provisions of the fifth article of the convention; but Mr. Jackson, having erected himself into a judge of what belonged to us and what to Spain, decided that Dauphin island was not an appendage of Louisiana, but of W est Florida, and therefore belonged to Spain at the period of the exchange of the ratifications of the treaty of Ghent, and refused to consent to the proposed reference. Dauphin island was, during the late war, reduced and occupied by the British arms as a part of the territory of the United States. Had it not been a part of their territory, the military occupation of it by Great Britain would have been an unprovoked act of war on her part against Spain, with whom she was then in peace. It was, on the return of peace, surrendered to the United States as a 'territory, place, or possession' (to use the language of the treaty of Ghent) taken from them during the war. Thus, in order to screen the British Government from the indemnity due to American citizens for one or two hundred negro slaves, Mr. Jackson would represent his nation as having committed an act of deliberate and wanton war upon the territories of a friendly and unoffending sovereign, and as having, after perpetrating that act of enormity, transferred the territory violently wrested from that sovereign to the United States, who had no right, to it. The mere statement of the case, which truth compels me to make, must wound the sensibility of his Britannic Majesty's Government. If it were creditable to discuss the question of the right of the United States to Dauphin island, it would be easy to show that the Province of Louisiana, which was ceded to them on the 30th of April, 1803, extended as far cast as the Perdido, and, of course, included the Bay of Mobile; that, prior to the late war with Great Britain, the United States had actually taken possession of the whole Province up to that limit; that they had incorporated the Bay of Mobile, including Dauphin island, in one of their territories, and governed it by their laws ; and that the treaty with Spain of the 22d day of February, 1819, did not operate as an original cession, but only as a confirmation of their previous title, acquired under that with France, to the country lying between the Perdido and the island of New Orleans. It would have been a more compendious mode of disposing of this claim, on the part of Mr. Jackson, to have drawn in question our title to any part of Louisiana, as was done during the conferences at Ghent. He would then have gotten rid of the territory, the claimant, and his slaves. But the conclusive answer to his plea is to be found in the terms of the first article of the treaty of Ghent. They stipulate that 'all territory, places, and possessions whatsoever taken by either party from the other during the war, or which may be taken after the signing of this treaty, excepting only the islands hereinafter mentioned, shall be restored without delay, and without causing any destruction, or carrying away any of the artillery or other public property originally captured in the said forts or places, and which shall remain therein upon the exchange of the ratifications of this treaty, or any slaves or other private property.' Dauphin island was not one of those which were excepted from surrender.- That article binds the high contracting parties to a mutual restoration of territory, places, and possessions, without regard to the consideration of title. The mere fact of possession prior to the war determined the duty of restoration on the return of peace. It was so intended, and well understood by both parties. Under that stipulation, as being one of the possessions taken from us during the war, the mouth of the Columbia has been restored, although our title to it was subsequently contested by Great Britain. And from none of the places or possessions thus to be restored was Great Britain to carry away any slave or other property. If this impeachment of our title to or possession of Dauphin island (for which, at an earlier period, Mr. Jackson might have been entitled to the grateful acknowledgments of Spain, but which, at this late day, will hardly be made) had been even colorable, the claim of D' Villiers might have presented a fit subject of reference to the arbitrator of the convention. Incontestable as both title and possession were, Mr. Cheves, in consideration of what belonged to the character and dignity of his Government, would not have been without justification if he had declined an arbitration of the question had it been offered by the other Commissioner. In tendering it himself, you cannot fail to perceive manifested by him the greatest moderation and the strongest dispo sition faithfully to execute the fifth article of the convention. Nor can you avoid contrasting the conduct of the two Commissioners in this respect. Whilst Mr. Jackson refuses to refer, to say the least of it, the debatable question of interest, Mr. Cheves is willing to refer a case in which our clear and indisputable right to Dauphin island was the only point to be collaterally adjudicated.



Henry Clay arguing that it was impossible for Great Britain to ignore Dauphin Island's American sovereignty https://books.google.com/books?id=3bceBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA348&lpg=PA348&dq=adjudication+%22dauphin+island%22&source=bl&ots=xY9va1Zxq5&sig=WtIYt9EmZWW8tM0BdPcXZaLGPUU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjIz7-2msHOAhVK7iYKHZqYAqAQ6AEILzAD#v=onepage&q=adjudication%20%22dauphin%20island%22&f=false


Piracy in the 19th century 
 http://www.academia.edu/12243967/Among_Ships_of_Thieves_on_Waves_of_Change_Piracy_in_the_Gulf_and_Caribbean_1800-1835
 Profound geopolitical and social upheaval plagued the Atlantic world in the first few decades of the nineteenth century as a result of the Napoleonic War, Haitian Revolution, Anglo-American banning of the transatlantic slave trade, Latin American Wars of Independence, and the rise of the modern nation state and politics. More specifically the
revolutions spanning from 1775 to 1824 changed the Atlantic world “beyond recognition.”

 In some ways they all also contributed to the explosion of piracy in the first thirty violent years of the nineteenth century.

Mobile secession dissertation https://etd.auburn.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10415/1326/LU_LING_5.pdf?sequence=1&ts=1467519955817




dauphin island mortar https://books.google.com/books?id=_IkFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38&dq=%22dauphin+island%22+mortar+%22shell+banks%22&source=bl&ots=xxzdN5aTCQ&sig=xxiapu1_oXliRuoFYKRU1Ka_q4U&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjS982r17nOAhVFTSYKHWEfAtIQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=%22dauphin%20island%22%20mortar%20%22shell%20banks%22&f=false

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Since the above was written, we have been kindly favored with a copy of the following letter from Professor A. D. Bache, Superintendent Uni States Coast Survey, to our friend and townsman S. G. Fisher, Esq., concerning the recent discoveries in Mobile Bay, made by the Survey, under the immediate direction of Lieut. Com. Pattison, United States Navy. In connection with the Mobile and Ohio Railroad, these discoveries are of the highest importance, establishing conclusively, as they do, the superior advantages of Mobile Bay over any other harbor of the Gulf, as the seaboard terminus for a great system of internal improvement. Coast Sravey STATIoN, near Manchester, JV. H., Sept. 5, 1848. S. GRIFFITT's FishER, Esq., of Mobile. Dear Sir: In reply to your request, for the most recent information in regard to the changes at the entrance to Mobile Bay, and to the depth of water of 203 feet upon the bar, I send you the following extracts from a recent report by Lieut. Con. C. P. Pattison, United States Navy, the Assistant in the Coast Survey, to whom the credit is due for the excellent progress and interesting discoveries made in the hydrography of that section of the survey: 1st. The depth of water which can be carried over the bar at the entrance of Mobile Bay at mean low water, is 203 feet mean rise, and fall of tide one foot. 2d. The channel is perfectly easy, one course N.]19° W. true, going through with one or two casts on the ridge of shoalest water. 3d. Continued strong northerly winds depress the water at the extreme 2 feet below mean low water; and continued south-east and south winds elevate it 24 feet—in rare cases to an extreme of 4 feet. 4th. In heavy gales, the sea is said to break across the bar. This I have never seen, but judge it must be the case. 5th. After crossing the bar the channel varies from one-half to seven-eighths of a mile in width, averaging 7 fathoms in depth, and perfectly clear. 6th. The depth of water immediately at the end of the wharf at Fort Morgan, Mobile Point, is 63 feet; 150 yards out, there are 5 fathoms; and in mid-channel, abreast of the wharf, one third of a mile out, there are 9 fathoms. 7th. The depth of water at the anchorage of the fleet of merchant vessels in the bay, is 34 fathoms. There is perfectly secure anchorage, in any winds, for large vessels off the west end of Mobile Point, with the light-house bearing from S. E. to S. S. W. in from 8 to 10 fathoms water, and distant from the shore from one to one-tenth of a mile.8th. There is a fine harbor for small vessels drawing not over 12 feet in Navy Cove, just to the north end of Mobile Point, secure in all winds, and easy of entrance. 9th. Pelican Island in 1822 was 1,723 yards long, in 1841 it was 2,757, and in 1847 it had increased to 3,457 yards, making an increase of 1,735 yards in 25 years. The north end of this island had made a few yards further out in 1848. The shore of Dauphin Island, to the north ward of Pelican, had cut out a few yards, so keeping the distance between them nearly the Raine, 10th. The distance between the north end of Pelican Island and Dauphin Island in 1822 was 1,957 yards; in 1841, it was 788; and in 1847 it was but 383 yards. The depth through this channel has remained the same since 1822, being 13 feet at mean low water. 11th. Sand Island, upon which stands the outer light-house, was in 1822 but 131 yards across; in 1841, it was 1,542 in length; and in 1847, it had decreased to 908 yards. This island is con stantly undergoing increasing or decreasing, as the various causes of change act upon it. With in the last year, the north point has been cut off for a distance of 60 yards, and the east shore for an average width of 15; whilst the shore to the north of the light-house has made out 60 yards. A small channel 10 or 15 yards wide, and 6 feet deep, which separated the north point from a small bank dry at low water was filled during one spring ebb tide. 12th. Little Sand Island, as it is called, where was in 1822 from 3 to 10 feet water, had made up into an island in 1841 of 952 yards in length, and increased to 2,625 yards in 1847. 13th. In 1822 the greatest depth which could be taken over the bar was 17 feet; in 1841 it was 19 feet; and him 1847 it was 203 feet, each at mean low water. 14th. In 1822, the distance from the position in which Sand Island light-house now stands, to the shoalest water in the channel on the bar, was 3,446 yards; in 1841, it was 3,531; and in 1847, it was 3,724 yards. 15th. Upon a line of soundings which took over the bar in 1841 but 13 feet, in 1847 the depth was 20 feet. 16th. The changes constantly taking place cannot better he illustrated than by the frequent appearance and disappearance of Little Pelican Island, which is often several feet above water, and as often as many below it. From these facts, it appears that the islands have been on the increase since 1822, whilst the bar itself, connected with them, has passed gradually seaward, deepening as it advanced. Yours, respectfully and truly, A. D. l'AcHk, Sup’t United States Coast Survey.

American Slavery As It Is page 85 " I will now mention the case of cruelty before referred to. In 1820 or 21, while the public works were going forward on Dauphin Island, Mobile Bay, a contractor, engaged on the works, beat one of his slaves so severely that the poor creature had no longer power to writhe under his    suffering : he then took out his knife, and began to cut his flesh in strips, from his hips down. At this moment, the gentleman referred to, who was also a contractor, shocked at such inhumanity, stepped forward, between the wretch and his victim, and exclaimed, ' If you touch that slave again you do it at the peril of your life." The slaveholder raved at him for interfering between him and his slave ; but he was obliged to drop his victim, fearing the arm of my friend — whose stature and physical powers were extraordinary."

DeBow's Review 1848 pages 383-384  THE COAST SURVEY The report of the Superintendent of the Coast Survey, reached us a few weeks ago, and it gives us much pleasure to notice in our number, the rapid progress which this great national work, is making under the direc tion of the present indefatigable and distinguished superintendent, Pro fessor Alexander Dallas Bache. This gentleman visited our city last spring for the purpose of arson ally superintending the operations and survey of the eighth an ninth sections of this great work extending from Dauphin Island to Galveston Ba . ave had then ample opportunity of witnessing the zeal with which he pushed the work in this important section of the Coast Survey, until the summer heat compelled him to go north, where he was engaged the remainder of the year on the eastern section. The coast of the United States is divided into nine sections of nearly equal extent of shore line : N o. 1. From Passamaquoddy ‘bay to Point Judeth. From Point Judeth to Cape Henlopen. From Cape Henlopen to Cape Henry. From Cape Henry to Cape ear. From Cape Fear to St. Mary’s River. From St. Mary’s to St. Joseph’s Bay. From St. Joseph's Ba to Mobile Buy. From Mobile Bay to ermillion Bay. 9. From Vermillion Bay to the boundary of Texas. Up to 1844, the operations of the Coast Survey had only been extended to nine States, while now it embraces eighteen States, including three on the Gulf of Mexico. In every section the methods are the same, so that the results brought to Washington are published in detached parts to meet the ur nt demand for information, which the accurate system and frequent ‘scovories of the Coast Survey create. The number of sheet maps and charts now published is sixteen; and in the course of this year at least live more will be added.Although the most valuable results of the Coast Survey are the furnish ing of accurate maps and charts, at first cost, the superior execution of which reflects great credit upon the gentlemen employed in this department by the government, yet these are not the only results obtained from year to year, which attest the importance of fostering this branch of public ser vice in a commercial point of view. The discoveries of Gidney’s channel into New York harbor; of Blake’s channel in Delaware Bay, the new shoal near the island of Nantucket, and a new channel of twenty feet at the entrance of Mobile bay, are among those not the least important that have saved to the commerce of the United States more than a thousand times the expense of making the Coast Survey. We regret we have not space to bring to the notice of our readers all that has been accomplished in the eighteen States, we shall therefore be obliged to close this article by stating what has been done during the past year in the Mississippi sound. In this section a base line has been meas sured on Dauphin Island; the rimary triangulation has been continued by filling up at stations not alrea y occupied; the secondary triangulation has been carried westward to Cat Island and the subjacent shores. The to pography of the entrance to Mobile bay, and part of the Island chain from Mobile bay to Lake Borgne, has been executed; the hydrography of the entrance to‘Mobile bay is being nearly completed, and that of Mississippi sound north of the base is in progress. A survey of Cat island harbor for the accommodation of shipping and the British mail lime of steamers in connexion with the Mexican Gulf railway has been comple: ted, operations too have recently commenced in Galveston bay and harbor. These taken together with the new channel round Dauphin island the still more important discovery of a deeper channel into Mobile bay, the establishment of a harbor at Cat islan , are but the beginnings of more brilliant prospects for the local and general commerce in the Gulf.
 

Isaac McKeever (1791-1856) http://losttosight.com/2014/07/commodore-isaac-mckeever/
deserves to be associated with Dauphin Island as much as any member of the U.S. Navy who has ever served in the Gulf of Mexico. As a part of Commodore Patterson's anti-piracy squadron in the Gulf, McKeever made his mark in the shallow water of the Mississippi Sound and the mouth of Mobile Bay. McKeever participated in the September 1814 U.S. Navy attack on Lafitte's headquarters on Grand Terre Island at the mouth of Barataria Bay. After Lafitte's headquarters were destroyed and he had received a pardon due to his assistance of the U.S. at the Battle of New Orleans, Lafitte relocated his pirate band to Galveston Island and ended most of the his activity around D.I. http://www.historiaobscura.com/daniel-todd-pattersons-secret-visits-to-dauphin-island-in-1814/

 Isaac McKeever was commander of one of the two U.S. Navy gunboats that were cruising off Dauphin Island in December of 1814 when he became one of the first U.S. military men to witness the entire Royal Navy's North American Invasion Force sail into view over the horizon and he immediately escaped by sailing into Mississippi Sound to Pass Christian to bring the word that the British had arrived for their attack on New Orleans.http://www.historiaobscura.com/pattersons-mistake-the-battle-of-lake-borgne-revisited/

A few days later, he commanded U.S. Navy gunboat #23 during the Battle of Lake Borgne and was the last American commander to surrender his ship. 
From the Military Hall of Honor:
The [U.S.] gunboats mounted collectively 23 guns, and were manned by 182 men. The British expedition consisted of 42 large barges and other boats, manned by over 1,000 seamen and marines. The engagement, which was very severe, lasted more than three hours, and over 200 of the British were killed and wounded. Lieutenant McKeever’s vessel was the last one attacked, and he was severely wounded, together with most of his officers, before he surrendered.

In the spring of 1818, McKeever headed a U.S. Navy convoy from New Orleans that sailed past Dauphin Island on its way to St. Marks to support Andrew Jackson's army during the First Seminole War. This was the first of many "Seminole Wars" which were unique in that the U.S. Navy played a significant role and slavery was a major cause of the fighting. When McKeever arrived in Apalachee Bay he encountered William Hambly, an employee of the John Forbes & Co. store on the Apalachicola River. Hambly had just escaped from captivity by the Seminoles and he informed McKeever that the Prophet Francis (a.k.a. Hillis Hadjo), the Red Stick religious leader most responsible for the outbreak of the Creek War of 1813-1814, was looking forward to the arrival of a British supply ship.http://www.academia.edu/18033250/Milly_Francis_The_Life_and_Times_of_the_Creek_Pocahontas
 McKeever then took one of the naval convoy's chartered schooners, the THOMAS SHIELDS, out past the horizon and then sailed it back into Apalachee Bay flying the British flag. The Indians took the bait and soon a canoe carrying the Prophet Francis paddled out to the THOMAS SHIELDS. The Prophet also brought the Seminole chief responsible for Scott's Massacre, Homothlimico http://www.exploresouthernhistory.com/scottmassacre.html, along with him. McKeever immediately apprehended both men, turned them over to U.S. Army personnel at St. Marks and both Indians were hanged by Jackson's army without trial. McKeever doesn't mention them being hanged in his deposition where he described the events leading up to their arrest:


" I, Isaac McKeever, a lieutenant in the navy of the United States, on oath declare, that the following narration contains a true statement of facts, to the best of my knowledge. I commanded the naval force which convoyed the store-ships, transports, &c. from New Orleans to Fort Gadsden, and from thence to the bay of St. Marks, during the Seminole war. I arrived in the said bay on the 1st of April, 1818, with British colors flying at my mast head; on the next day I was visited by a Spanish lieutenant, the second in command at Fort St. Marks. The lieutenant was inquisitive as to the character of my vessels and the nature of my visit, and wished to know whether I had any authority from the Captain General of Cuba for entering the territories of His Catholic Majesty. In reply, I asked him if he had seen my colors on entering the bay of St. Marks, and intimated that the nature of my visit could not be satisfactorily explained until the arrival of Captain Woodbine, at the same time intimating that it was of an illicit character, and that succor, aid, &c. to Hillishajo and his warriors, in their present distress, was intended. At the mention of this he expressed much satisfaction, stated that Captain Woodbine and the Spanish commandant of St. Marks were good friends, and voluntarily gave me every information as to the movements of General Jackson's force, and his strength; the situation of the hostile Indians he detailed at length, and stated, what rejoicing the reception of the long promised and expected succor would occasion. He stated that Hillishajo and the Spanish commandant were on intimate terms; that the former was then in the vicinity, and had lately been at the fort of St. Marks, when he had urged, with menaces.the commandant to send on board to ascertain to demonstration the character of the strangers; and, having satisfied himself, he would see Hillishajo that evening, after which we might expect a visit from the latter, who accordingly came on board the following morning. He likewise informed me that Arbuthnot, a friend to the hostile Indians, and an acquaintance of Woodbine's, was in Fort St. Marks. On my expressing to him some apprehension of being blockaded by an American squadron reported to be on the coast, or of my retreat being cut off by Jackson, he replied, that the latter was impossible; that Jackson had but five pieces of artillery, and the impracticability of the swamp would prevent his assuming any position below me; but that I need apprehend no danger from any quarter; that, as allies, by anchoring under the guns of the fort, protection would be afforded me. About this time we were informed by the Spanish officers and Indians, who came on board, that, on our arrival within the bay, the Indian camp demonstrated much joy at the approach of their expected supplies of munitions, &c. I. McKEEVER. New Orleans, June 5, 1819. Sworn this 5th June, 1819, DOM. A. HALL, Dial. Judge U. S. Lou. Dial."

After escorting the supply ships for Jackson's army to St. Mark's, McKeever sailed west to support Jackson's capture of Pensacola in May. The events in Pensacola would lead to years of litigation and would influence the Congress to pass laws which made the penalty for slave smuggling the same as for piracy: punishable by death. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_to_Protect_the_Commerce_of_the_United_States_and_Punish_the_Crime_of_Piracy 

On June 18,  McKeever ,captaining the USS SURPRISE, captured two American ships carrying Spanish slaves in the vicinity of Pensacola and then sailed these ships, along with their cargo and slaves to Mobile where everything was condemned and sold. It has been written that the 1818 seizure of these ships in Pensacola signaled "the start of a test of the American commitment to stopping the international trade of African slaves and an intense legal battle, foreign and domestic, over property rights to the slaves aboard these ships." http://rrcaolt.weebly.com/uploads/8/4/7/0/8470429/olt_paper_sample.pdf

After McKeever captured the first two slave ships and sailed them to Mobile to have them condemned, the U.S. Army commander at Fort Barrancas, Colonel George W. Brooke, decided he would seize the next one that showed up so he could get the prize money. On June 21, the Constitution sailed into Pensacola Bay and Colonel Brooke seized it. The Constitution was carrying 84 African slaves and a valuable cargo of other goods. Brooke placed Captain A.L. Sands of the U.S. Army in charge of the ship and ordered him to sail it to Mobile for condemnation. As Captain Sands rounded Mobile Point he was boarded and claimed by Captain Curtis Lewis ( Lewis was captain of the U.S. Revenue Ship in Mobile Bay. He produced the famous map which the Federal government used in making its decision to build a fort on Dauphin Island. His wife's father, De Vaubercey http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSsr=281&GScid=22123&GRid=12774704& was the son-in-law of Major Robert Farmar (namesake of D.I.'s "Major Farmar Street") who had made a private land claim for Dauphin Island for the Farmar estate http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSsr=281&GScid=22123&GRid=12835704&.  
De Vaubercey built a mortar factory on Dauphin Island using lime produced from the shell mounds. This mortar was used later in 1818 to build the foundation for the first American fort on Dauphin Island). Captain Lewis' claim to the Constitution was overruled by an Alabama court in 1822.

The owners of the slaves ships, slaves and cargo appealed the seizures to the U.S. Supreme Court where all the condemnations were upheld except for the 84 slaves on board the Constitutions. The Spanish owners of these slaves received restitution on the legal technicality that they had not been seized by an officer of a U.S. ship but by a U.S. Army officer. McKeever had to testify so many times that his expenses were greater than any prize money he ever received. Finally, after McKeever had to petition for his expenses, the Congress passed a bill nine years after the incident compensating McKeever for his trouble.https://books.google.com/books?id=04mJJlND1ccC&pg=PA118&lpg=PA118&dq=constitution+african+slaves+1818+%22released+from+bond%22&source=bl&ots=s4OfsqtLWD&sig=wRHgf1jgck1vhXEeTtSTH2m1ETQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjkg9Oc2MjOAhVEPCYKHWGDAjkQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=constitution%20african%20slaves%201818%20%22released%20from%20bond%22&f=false

About 1822, Lt. McKeever became part of Commodore David Porter's WEST INDIES SQUADRON https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Indies_Squadron_(United_States)
which patrolled the Gulf and Caribbean for pirates and slave smugglers. In 1825, Lt. McKeever took over command of the USS SEA GULL, the second steamship in the U.S. Navy and lead expeditions along the coast of Cuba in search of pirates.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Sea_Gull_(1818)
 He was commissioned commander in 1830 , captain in 1838 and ultimately attained the rank of commodore.

In 1849, McKeever again had an impact upon the Dauphin Island area when, as commandant of the Brooklyn Navy Yard, he confiscated two steamers loaded with supplies for the Cuban revolutionaries of General Narcisso Lopez. http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/articles/Mississippi-Winter-02.pdf   The revolutionaries had violated the Neutrality Law of 1818, prohibiting armed enterprises against nations at peace with the United States. Round Island north of Petit Bois off Pascagoula served as a staging area for the revolutionaries of this failed expedition. The revolutionaries' rendezvous on Round Island was broken up in the fall of 1849 by a blockade by the U.S. Navy but reorganized in 1850 and one of the revolutionaries' commanders was Theodore O'Hara, namesake of D.I.'s O'HARA LANE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_O%27Hara

 Isaac McKeever continued to serve as an officer in the U.S. Navy up to the moment of his death in 1858.  His naval career spanned 47 years. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=5045

Tuesday, August 09, 2016

Let's see if any of you DOTHAN TIGERS can solve this little quiz: What do all of these things have in common? (1) Your classmate's older brother (2) Barrentine's (3) Lokey's (4) The Busy Bee (5) Baptist Bottom http://robertoreg.blogspot.com/2004_07_18_archive.html

Monday, August 08, 2016

 DAUPHIN ISLAND REPARATIONS
Equally difficult questions arose in regard to the slaves
taken away from Dauphin Island in Mobile Bay.74 This
island, controlled by the British during the war, was later
surrendered to the United States. Concerning this Jack-
son held that it was not legally at the time of the ratifica-
tions of the treaty a part of the United States, that is, it
was not a part of Louisiana but belonged to West Florida,
which was not ceded to the United States until 1819.75 In
regard to this Cheves offered to refer these claims to arbi-
tration, but in this view Jackson refused to acquiesce. The
situation did not become any better even when Rufus King
was sent as our minister to England to succeed Henry Clay
who became John Quincy Adams's Secretary of State.



Lieut. McKeever’s command was the last to capitulate, and he himself and most of his officers were severe] wounded. His conduct on this occasion attracted the attention of Gen. Jackson, who became his lifelong friend, and at whose particular request he co-operated in the capture of Pensacola four years later. In his general orders dated May 29. 1818, Jackson wrote:"Capt. McKeever, of the navy, merits (as he has on several other occasions) the warmest thanks of the general, for his zealous cooperation and activity in landing two of his guns and gallantly offering to lay his vessel be fore the water battery, in the event of storming the upper works."

 There were to be no half-way measures now. Writing to Captain McKeever, commissioned to co-operate with him by sea, Jackson designated St. Mark's as the first point of attack, instructed Mc Keever to meet him there, and signifi cantly added : " You will . . . capture and make prisoners all, or every person, or description of persons, white, red, or black, with all their goods, chattels, and effects, together with all crafts, vessels, or means of transportation by water. . . . Any of the subjects of His Catholic Majesty sailing to St. Mark's may be permitted freely to enter the said river. But none to pass out, unless after an examination it may be made to appear that they have not been attached, to or in any wise aided and abetted our common enemy." The meaning of this language was plain enough. To blockade Spanish ports, to seize Spanish property, and to make prisoners of Spanish subjects — such was Jackson's programme. In cidentally, he proposed capturing, if possible, certain Englishmen at whose door he laid the chief responsibility for the present Indian rising, and who, he had reason to believe, were then at St. Mark's, together with two Indian chief tains who had proved especially malevo lent. To St. Mark's, then, he hastened, as did McKeever, the latter scrupling not to sail into the bay under the English flag, and by this disgraceful ruse lure aboard the chieftains for whose lives Jackson thirsted. Jackson's own course was openness itself. Frankly informing the Spanish commandant that so long as the struggle with the Indians lasted it was necessary to occupy St. Mark's with American troops, he marched his men into the town, hauled down the Spanish flag, and raised in its stead the Stars and Stripes. No damage was done to per son or property, and only one prisoner taken — a Scotchman, Alexander Arbuth- not, an aged Indian trader who was suspected of having intrigued against American interests. Next day, without so much as the "semblance of a trial, McKeever's native captives were hanged, a fate which they doubtless richly de served ; and

Saturday, August 06, 2016

 Milly Francis book http://www.academia.edu/18033250/Milly_Francis_The_Life_and_Times_of_the_Creek_Pocahontas


1819 house debates https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=YRBmAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA277
TALLMADGE'S DEFENSE OF JACKSON
 page 260
 Arbuthnot and Ambrister, two English emissaries, in a neutral Spanish territory, instigating a savage war upon a peaceful American state When our government complain, the British Minister answers they have not jurisdiction out of their own country, and can not prevent the evil. The Spanish Governor says he has not the power to control Indians and English subjects, and worthy gentlemen on this floor, tell us it is a neutral country, and, therefore, we cannot help our selves. Were ever doctrines advanced so preposterous ! Had General Jackson listened to such reasoning—had he returned with such arguments as the only result of his campaign ; what would have been the language of our bleeding frontier And, because he did not, a vote. of censure is solemnly proposed.




 page 264 ...with the murderer of Lieut. Scott's party in your possession, with the General and Prophet Francis your prisoner of war; with Arbuthnot and Ambrister, those civilized savages, instigators and procurers of this war, all in your power, who can doubt that the exercise of a sound discretion for the peace and safety of our country would doom them to death? ... Held by no treaty—bound by no ties—regardless of all faith—and influenced by no mercy—who would advise that such men should be turn ed loose to remingle with the misguided savages, exhibit ing themselves at once as the pledge of your weakness and your fears; and, with their trappings, as the sample of British munificence Your documents remind you that your Indian enemies read no books or papers—have no sources of information, but from such chiefs and such ents, by whom they have been told of your weakness l they really believed you dared not to brave the pow -er of their warriors, countenanced by British and Span ish officers. I regret, said Mr. T. the necessity of a re taliatory examplc. But,sir, Gen.Jackson wisely considered the circumstancescalledaloud forexample. Indians, Span iards, & Britons,all needed a lesson. And never did man se lect four more fit subjects to hang on high as an example to savage credulity, and as a warning to all adventurers to beware of combining against us in Indian wars. I hope, said Mr. T, this house will justify the measure. It will give effect to the example, and proclaim to the world the holicy of our country in all future Indian wars.


 page 271
 Cast your eye westward, over your newly acquired territory, extending to the Pacific Ocean, and inhabited by savage hordes; bounded on the north, by British territory, and on the south by Spanish possessions; can you longer doubt but the era has arrived, when you must avow and maintain the policy of your country, to prohibit the intercourse between Indians and foreign incendiaries When I reflect that the example before us, was upon British subjects, in a Spanish territory, it obtains the approbation of my judgment; it commands the joy of my heart. With such views, for the future good of this country, the gallant spirit of General Jackson did not pause. He ordered Arbuthnot and Ambrister to execution—justice approved the deed—mercy withheld the tear—and even humanity rejoiced. Yet, these men fell not unlamented. Theft, rapine, and murder, bewailed their loss. Superstition and cruelty; the one wrapped in the Spanish cloak, and inquisition’s cowl, the other clad in bleeding scalps, the trophies of their friend’s exploits, walked as the mourners to their tomb.

page 272
 Pensacola and the Fort Barrancas have been ta Gen. General Jackson, on the 20th of April, reduced his force, by dismissing the Georgia militia, and with the residue, he crossed the Appalachicola river, in pursuit of his dispersed &flying enemy. He soon learned that his ene my had free access to Pensacola,&was there openly supplied & armed from the public stores, and that thus reinvigorat ed, he issued forth in marauding parties, upon the Alaba ma frontier. Eighteen of her citizens recently had fall en a sacrifice to one of these Indian parties, coming di rectly from Pensacola, and again returning to that place. [Mr. T. went into an examination of the documents in relation to Pensacola, tending to shew its support of the Indians; the free use they had of the place ; its un friendly conduct towards us, and its departure from all neutral conduct.] When General Jackson approached the place, said Mr. T. it was filled with Indians. They were sent out of the place across the bay, in government boats, and at its final surrender, and in its capitulation, one of the hostile Alabama Chiefs was included. Per haps it ought not to be said that this place was in danger ... taken possession of by the Indians. But, in eve ry other respect, all that has becn said of the first entry across the Florida line, and the possession of St. Marks, is also applicable to this place. But,

Friday, August 05, 2016

 PURCHASE OF FLORIDA https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=5Eqgbzt7ID4C&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA249

Fuller, THE PURCHASE OF FLORIDA, P. 248 ~ In the meantime Captain McKeever had captured two more prisoners of note. Violating all rules of national law and by a ruse as disgraceful as it was exceptional, Mc Keever entered the bay with the English flag at his mast head and thus lured on board his ship the Indian prophet Francis and his companion Himollemico — the latter the savage who had attacked Lieutenant Scott's expedition. These Indians, supposing the ship to be the one long looked for from England with supplies and munitions of war, had boarded her and upon being enticed into the cabin were seized and bound. The next day they were sent up to the fort and hung by Jackson's order. For the capture of St. Marks, history.and investigation are unable to present an adequate justification. But we must stand aghast at Jackson's imperial assumption of the dread prerogative of arbitrarily dooming men to death without a trial. The prophet Francis was an educated man of pleasing manners, humane disposition, well versed in English and Spanish — indeed a model chief. Himollemico was the type of the cruel, morose, bloodthirsty savage, who probably richly deserved his fate, but no one has ever explained by what law or custom, observed in the service of the United States, they were put to death, when thus captured by an ignoble stratagem, not even on the field of battle, and without the bare formality of a trial of any sort.
ASP, MILITARY AFFAIRS https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=iJUbAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA726

 I, Isaac McKeever, a lieutenant in the navy of the United States, on oath declare, that the following narration contains a true statement of facts, to the best of my knowledge. I commanded the naval force which convoyed the store-ships, transports, &c. from New Orleans to Fort Gadsden, and from thence to the bay of St. Marks, during the Seminole war. I arrived in the said bay on the 1st of April, 1818, with British colors flying at my mast head; on the next day I was visited by a Spanish lieutenant, the second in command at Fort St. Marks. The lieutenant was inquisitive as to the character of my vessels and the nature of my visit, and wished to know whether I had any authority from the Captain General of Cuba for entering the territories of His Catholic Majesty. In reply, I asked him if he had seen my colors on entering the bay of St. Marks, and intimated that the nature of my visit could not be satisfactorily explained until the arrival of Captain Woodbine, at the same time intimating that it was of an illicit character, and that succor, aid, &c. to Hillishajo and his warriors, in their present distress, was intended. At the mention of this he expressed much satisfaction, stated that Captain Woodbine and the Spanish commandant of St. Marks were good friends, and voluntarily gave me every information as to the movements of General Jackson's force, and his strength; the situation of the hostile Indians he detailed at length, and stated, what rejoicing the re ception of the long promised and expected succor would occasion. He stated that Hillishajo and the Spanish com mandant were on intimate terms; that the former was then in the vicinity, and had lately been at the fort of St. Marks, when he had urged, with menaces.the commandant to send on board to ascertain to demonstration the cha racter of the strangers; and, having satisfied himself, he would see Hillishajo that evening, after which we might expect a visit from the latter, who accordingly came on board the following morning. He likewise informed me that Arbuthnot, a friend to the hostile Indians, and an acquaintance of Woodbine's, was in Fort St. Marks. On my expressing to him some apprehension of being blockaded by an American squadron reported to be on the coast, or of my retreat being cut off by Jackson, he replied, that the latter was impossible; that Jackson had but five pieces of artillery, and ihe impracticability of the swamp would prevent his assuming any position below me; but that I need apprehend no danger from any quarter; that, as allies, by anchoring under the guns of the fort, protection would be afforded me. About this time we were informed by the Spanish officers and Indians, who came on board, that, on our arrival within the bay, the Indian camp demonstrated much joy at the approach of their expected supplies of munitions, &c. I. McKEEVER. New Orleans, June 5, 1819. Sworn this 5th June, 1819, DOM. A. HALL, Dial. Judge U. S. Lou. Dial.

 I was Quartermaster General of the South Division on the Seminole campaign. At Fort Gadsden I received orders to proceed to Mobile and Fort Montgomery, for the purpose of forwarding supplies to the army, then on its march west. From Mobile I sent the schooner Little Sally, Captain Pastes, loaded with provisions, to the Perdido river, with instructions to remain there until the approach of the army, or until further (infers. Two days after we arrived at the Barancaa, Captain Pastes joined, and informed us that his vessel had been taken by a Spanish launch near the mouth of Perdido, and brought under the guns of the Fort Barancas, and detained several days. This was confirmed by several Spanish officers after we took possession of the fort. I certify, on my honor, to the truth of the above statement. GEORGE GIBSON, Washington, February 1, 1820. Late Quartermaster General of South Division. Sir: Navy Department, March 27, 1818. In the present state of hostilities between the Indians and the United States, your aid and co-operation may be required by the general commanding the United States' army in the South; you will therefore afford all the aid and support in your power, and keep up a correspondence for this purpose. Despatch immediately two gunboats and two of the smaller Tessels to Mobile, and to the Appalachicola, to pro tect the convoys of supplies, anil to remove any obstructions to a free communication between the/or/* and forces of the United States. It will be your duty also to adopt such further measures as the circumstances of the case or the development of events may render necessary. B. W. CROWNINSHIELD. P. S. Commandant J. D. Henley is also ordered to send one of the small vessels of his squadron to the Appa lachicola, which vessel will be subject to your order.

Thursday, August 04, 2016

In 1816, General E.P. Gaines (namesake of D.I.'s Fort Gaines as well as General Gaines Street) who was stationed at Fort Montgomery near present-day Tensaw in northern Baldwin County decided to experiment with a Gulf route to supply the new remote Army posts on the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers that were not served by any major roads. Fort Bowyer on Mobile Point became a major port of call on this Gulf route with flotillas and convoys bound for Apalachicola Bay stopping there for mail, for passengers or for refuge from bad weather. In the late fall of 1817, one of these U.S. Army supply flotillas taking the Gulf route to Apalachicola Bay passed Mobile Point on a voyage that would result in the death of many of its passengers and would launch the first of many so-called Seminole Wars which would at intermittent intervals consume the resources of the U.S. for the next forty years. This week's DAUPHIN ISLAND HISTORY post contains a chronology of the events leading up to SCOTT'S MASSACRE. This list of events will show that this tragic incident which led to war was produced by the necessity of using the Gulf route to supply the new American outposts established on the newly opened land acquired by the U.S. by theTreaty of Fort Jackson. http://dauphinislandhistory.blogspot.com

Tuesday, August 02, 2016